Exhibit #159 – A Moment in Time

EXHIBIT #159 photo a2a2a2a2_zps2a659620.jpg

Finally!  The trial of Arizona versus Arias has been turned over to the jury.  The clock has been started.  They have begun the last, yet most important step for the guilt phase of this trial.  I have shared what I would like to happen but we are way past my twenty nine minute mark, it was a nice neat wish.  I have found it futile to try to guess how long until a verdict is reached or what the outcome might be.  I do know that much like a tornado, it will show up when it wants to and with very little notice.  Just like a tornado we will brace ourselves for what it might bring and even scarier, what it will leave behind.

Full disclosure, I fast forward through most of the talking heads since HLN took over for InSession. I have been forced to spend way too much time with Jane, Nancy and Drew. I thought I had seen the worst with HLN Afterdark.  When Jane got an al fresco jury box, I was out.  HLN stole the trial and ignored some of the best legal analysts on TV.  I do push play for Beth Karras or Jean Cassarez.  I wonder just how many chins hit the floor when some may have heard for the first time, thanks to Jean and Beth, the back story of the pedophilia allegations.  They reported on them when they surfaced (two years after the murder) and the role they could have played if admitted by Judge Stevens.  During a pre-trial hearing before settling on self defense, the defense was seeking to admit letters, presented as written by Travis, into evidence to prove his attraction to children.  This hearing was very intense and the stakes sky high.  The state fought hard to keep them out. The letters were found to be fraudulent and not admitted.  The defendant tried to perpetrate a fraud on the court and she jammed her attorney up but good.  Mr. Nurmi was the literal definition of being left holding nothing but his dick in his hand.  The defendant and her attorney do not get along, that is just one of many reasons.  Then Mr. Juan-derful turned  around and tried to get them admitted to help prove the lengths the defendant will go to cover her tracks.  The Judge had to decide if these now fraudulent letters were more probative or more prejudicial to the defendant (pesky Constitution) and rightfully ruled them inadmissible.  I thought it was a brilliant attempt by Martinez to flip the script, but it was a long shot from a legal standpoint.  This is why Mr. Nurmi started spitting objections, becoming visibly unglued when the prosecutor alluded to a pretrial hearing during rebuttal when he pulled out the magazine with the secret message written in it.  Explaining what the defendant did in anticipation of that hearing but never divulging the fraud.  It is why all objections from Nurmi were over ruled. Infinitely more interesting than faux jurors and made up smoking gun scenarios for entertainment.  HLN will provide choreographed drama while InSession will provide facts, knowledge and application of the law.

Juan Martinez started his closing and as expected, he did not disappoint. He led the jury through the time line and the law.  To watch him deliver an extemporaneous closing was so very impressive.  Every word carefully chosen, rolling of his tongue in an effortless manner.  Premeditation was his theme and he did not deviate. He was sarcastic when needed, driving home the absurdity of the defendants lies. He pointed out each ridiculous excuse with his anger purposely visible, reminding the jury they have been lied to over and over to elicit their ire. We heard him refer to LaViolette and needing a code book to understand why all the lies weren’t so bad, the disdain dripping from his voice. He got to the gas cans and refuted one was returned. Hitting a nerve an objection was blurted out from the defense citing mischaracterization of the evidence. The judge sustained it. That made me sit up a little straighter. The prosecutor locked the defendant into the gas can being returned at the Salinas Walmart on cross. If the defense refutes the return how were they going to explain it??  Hold that thought, I did for a whole day. He spoke about sympathy having no role in their deliberations.  He called the defendant a liar and a murderer with heartfelt intensity.  He told the jurors the defense experts lied in their faces with no hesitation. He took command of the courtroom and kept everyone’s full attention. He transitioned between exhibits seamlessly. His path was clear that premeditation was the only option the jury should consider, unless they believe her lies. It was a masterful example of an immensely talented trial attorney.

In stark contrast, Mr. Nurmi gave his closing argument. He came off like a bear just waking up from hibernation.  Lethargic in manner and tone from the onset, he did finally gain some momentum as the day went on . He was almost starting to sound like he was advocating for his client.  At least until he slipped and referred to the defendants “theory” of events.  Whoops, he meant version of events.  He kept a straight face as he tried to explain away the state’s evidence and his clients lies.  He sifted through exhibits like he was going through old bills that needed to be thrown out.  He only raised his voice when desperate to convince the jury of the most implausible justifications.  He did stay true to form and replayed the phone sex edited just like at trial to highlight the victims voice.  His agenda to portray the victim as a sexual deviant caused his client to openly laugh when he asked the jury who references a twelve year old girl during phone sex.  Almost as an after thought, he mentioned the gas cans.  He was insistent that the defendant never said it was the Salinas Walmart, implying the return could have happened at any Walmart.  Then he moved on, oblivious by design or incompetence to the fact his client did say it was Salinas. I waited for his explanation and upon hearing it knew he just gave Martinez a gift for rebuttal.  A-Ha! His breakdown of the murder were impossible to follow.  Left hand, right hand, dragging the body, standing over the body, under the body.  All of that only to forget his client was ambidextrous.  He argued chaos and dysfunction.  He asked the jury to believe the defendant was a battered woman who just finally snapped. He didn’t even sound convinced. His client is so smart she would have trashed receipts, shot him instead of using a knife, borrow or just take the gun, use her parents car. All the “why” questions he posed to the jury to debunk the states theory could have been answered with because my client is bat shit crazy. It was an odd approach.  Thankfully he started to wrap it up. Still managing to keep a straight face, he said said if his client is guilty of anything, it is manslaughter.  He didn’t say out loud never mind the self defense but it hung in the air like the smell from  decomposition his client created.  Mr. Nurmi did his job. He was competent but unlikeable.  He tried to convey his belief in his client, it fell flat.

I would like to highlight one person the legal pundits don’t speak about much. An unsung hero behind the scenes. The person the pursuit of justice started with. The unofficial co-chair to Mr. Martinez, Detective Esteban Flores. Clearly a seasoned detective he was methodical in his interrogation of the defendant. The  way he questioned her, we can see in hindsight what he was doing, but because of his delicate style, the defendant never did. That’s a skill and talent that can’t be taught in a class or found in an instruction manual. It is from years of putting together puzzles and trusting that tingle he gets when some one is lying to him.  That is what we got to see in action.  If the victim were my brother I would be grateful it was his turn to investigate the crime.  Job well done sir and thank you for helping the Alexander family through a living nightmare.  I hope he knows that some of us realize how important his work was and still is.

Those of us watching have already decided who did a better job, who made their case best and who we believe.  The one thing both sides do agree on is State’s Exhibit #159 – the last picture of Travis Alexander still alive.  A moment in time indeed.

Lisa Renee

This entry was posted in In The News, Trials and The Law and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to Exhibit #159 – A Moment in Time

  1. BB says:

    I haven’t watched any of the trial but have read a little about it. Great summary of the closing arguments, Lisa Renee. When they meet on Monday, I hope the jury doesn’t take long to come up with a verdict of guilty of murder in the first degree.

    • lisarenee64 says:

      Thank you so much NanaBB. Your support is appreciated and very sweet. I am hoping it is quick also, no more nancy drew or jane 🙂 Lisa

  2. ladebra says:

    After watching what happened in the Casey Anthony trial, I really hesitate to hope that the verdict should be so self evident. But the prosecuter and team did their job, and I hope justice is done in this case.

    I really enjoyed reading your summation of the closings. Very insightful and informative.

    • lisarenee64 says:

      ladebra, I feel ya! I wonder if they are scared of an unpoular verdict since the Pinellas 12 received death threats. Judge Perry sealed their identities for a 3 month cooling off period and it didn’t help. Even if they were sequestered with local pre trail publicity they had to know going in the community wanted justice. Thrilled you enjoyed it, Lisa

  3. Hey Lisa, Juan Martinez did a closing argument the way it should be done. He never lost focus, fumbled around for exhibits and evidence, or referred to any notes for more than a nanosecond. Then he gave the jury two different ways to find her guilty of M1 – premeditated or felony murder. He’s a true professional and advocate.
    Nurmi. Oh my. What can I say… It took an hour or so for his Ambien to wear off, I guess. A couple of times while I was watching, I felt like I’d taken some. Flipping through receipts, dropping his papers all over the floor and forgetting crucial testimony – not so good. He didn’t so much as argue in defense of his client, but tried to pick apart Martinez’ closing. The best he could come up with was that a smart girl like Jodi would have committed murder better – steal a bigger gun, throw away her receipts, yada, yada, yada. . All that talk about “covert missions” and “it doesn’t make any sense” was pitiful. The system requires that she have competent counsel and maybe that’s what she got, barely.

    • lisarenee64 says:

      Empress, Guess who had her 11am flight canceled again! Just back from the airport, its 5 minutes from my home. She is taking 3 flights to get to chicago via houston now & cant reach her final destination until the 7am tomorrow by amtrak. Her roommie is from chicago so she is going to wait for her, spend night with roomies family & they will both leave then. The itinerary from the start was just life stupid, I should have pulled rank, not sign off on it. I’m done with the respect my choice PC crap. All this so the girls could bring back to school some cupcakes from some renowned bakery in Chi-town, such BS. I have reinstated my veto powers, if it costs me money, you get a demotion lol.
      Agreed regarding Martinez. Watching a seasoned attorney is a real treat. I felt the same way after the closing, if she had planned this, she would have done a better job. Weak so weak. Covert mission, I ignored that on purpose. Nurmi tried to pick apart a case set in stone. Sorry about they typos, I’m trying to get better. Lisa

      • Doesn’t sound like Mama’s happy. LOL! Those must be some cupcakes. At least we won’t have to raise more ransom money.
        You mean you didn’t like the covert mission by Ninja Jodi?!?! 😉

  4. TexasTart says:

    Thanks to BB, I found out you are blogging over here at the farm! Yay! While I have not watched or had interest in this particular trial; I’ll read anything you write and read this one – good job! 🙂

    • lisarenee64 says:

      TT, My sister from another mister, so funny we both rock Rx RayBans. Thanks for reading & the kind words, I caught your other comment also 🙂 Lisa

  5. melthehound says:

    After reading comments and the recap of these closing arguments, I’m kind of sorry that I missed them. Had I seen them, I might have a better clue of what’s going on with the trial. However, with the comments and the recap, I think you nailed it perfectly, Lisa. She left her lawyer with nothing but his dick in his hand. What I don’t understand, because I didn’t watch any of it, what do gas cans have to do with the price of tacos in Arizona? Was she going to burn the house down after she whacked him?

    • lisarenee64 says:

      MTH, Trying to figure out how to express what she did to her attorney, a Godfather reference always fits. We don’t get to see many real moments like that. I was shocked I got it pass empress lol. If you can stomach it try and catch some HLN in the morning. They will be showing “key moments” until a verdict. Dickens is right about the gas cans. It goes to the core of the pre-meditation. No one was ever to know she was there, that was her plan. No video but she left a paper trail, when you review the reciepts & count the gallons she bought, if there was no third can she would have had to carry it in her hand. My best to you and the hound, Lisa

      • melthehound says:

        Thank you (and dickens) for the explanation. Now that I know, I do remember reading something about it. It has been so long since I’ve seen it, I completely missed the reference of Sonny telling Clemenza, that he didn’t want his brother coming out of that bathroom with just his dick in his hand 😉

        I think you’ll find that Empress doesn’t edit us. She lets us own what we say in our posts and I would dare to say, lets us take whatever comes as a result. That is, unless it’s obviously meant to start a flame war. I know you wouldn’t do that and I like to think, I wouldn’t either. Keep up the great posts.

  6. dickens says:

    MTH, the gas cans were used so that there wouldn’t be any evidence of her being in Arizona. She wouldn’t have to buy gas and risk being caught on camera at a gas station.
    Good job, Lisa Renee. I’ve watched every minute of the trial and agree with you on every count.

    • lisarenee64 says:

      Dickens, It is lovely that you agree with me and never any hard feelings if you didn’t. What I really appreciate is that If you watched every minute you could have told me if I got something wrong. I am trying to be accurate. Tomorrow will be interesting 🙂 Lisa

Comments are closed.